In the Philippines, the 1987 Constitution has guaranteed equal opportunities for public service and thus, it has prescribed a prohibition on political dynasties from running in elections (see Section 26, Article II). However, it has mandated the legislature to define what a political dynasty is.
One may wonder as to the intention of the framers on how political dynasty must be defined. If it were their desire to ban political dynasties, why did they not define the term itself? Were they not aware that the time will come and true enough it did, when Congress will somewhat be a family affair where members of the same family will alternate in serving the people?
Generally, the perception of what a political dynasty is, would simply be a situation where family members or relatives are running for and serving in elective positions. This should differentiated from nepotism where family members are appointed to government positions or offices.
At this time, let it be made clear that there is no enabling law which defines and actually prescribes any penalty against political dynasty. Consequently, there is no political dynasty to talk about as of the moment. Legally, it is not existing and therefore, any person, whether belonging to a political clan or family of politicians, may exercise the right to run for any public office. It is the people who will decide whether they would want such member of the family or clan to elected or otherwise.
It's people's choice actually.
