We should be guided by the following :
- Contrary to what has been reported in the news, no evidence has actually been admitted yet. This means that documents were merely marked, and thereafter, if offered in evidence, that is the time when the court will rule on their admissibility as evidence for or against the person on trial.
- The subpoena served on the Clerk of Court who brought with her the various SALNs and whether they could be delivered to the Senate Court even without the Supreme Court authorization is not really the issue. What could actually be discerned from the proceedings as the actual and vital issues are whether the Impeachment Court can "order" the Supreme Court, and whether the Supreme Court can "prevent" the Impeachment Court. This cannot be discussed at this time pending the Supreme Court's ruling on the authorization sought by its own Clerk of Court, notwithstanding the presentation and marking of the SALNs, and the official reaction, if any, of the Senate Court to the said ruling or pronouncement.
- The entire proceedings today can be likened to a mere pre-trial conference where documents are presented for identification and for markings. It does not prove anything yet which may be favourable to or against the person on trial.
The Presiding Officer and the Impeachment Court actually are very accommodating and their patience is being tested. Good for the prosecution. This is considering the fact that there were just so much missed by it but which were clarified when the Senator-Judges profounded their respective questions to the witnesses. The defense panel (actually in the person of the distinguished retired Justice) on the other hand has been very professional and dignified, and was forceful and assertive.
Thus, for Day 3 – not much. Yes. Sad to state - not much.
