As public servants, we took an oath to uphold the people's will at all
times. All who hold positions in the government of our Republic are
accountable for their actions. For the power of the sovereign Filipino
people is a power that is higher than the Executive, the Legislative or
even the Judiciary. And therefore, no matter how high and mighty one's
position may be, one can never, ever be beyond public accountability.
Today, we lay down before this impeachment tribunal the product of the
collective voice of the people. Impeachment of Supreme Court Chief Justice
Renato Corona for betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the
Constitution, and for graft and corruption is the verdict in the House of
Representatives. By issuing such verdict, we took the first step to
accomplish our oath as the keepers of the people's trust.
Let me be clear: We are not here to indict the Supreme Court as an
institution, or to do battle with the judicial branch of government. We are
here to search for the truth so as to restore the strength and independence
of the judiciary. We are here because one man – Chief Justice Renato
Corona — has bartered away for a pot of porridge the effectiveness, the
independence, and the honor of the Supreme Court.
Mr. Senate President, your honors, one very important question before this
honorable impeachment tribunal is, by what standards should Renato Corona
be judged?
You only have to look at the Supreme Court itself to know the answer. As
you climb its steps, you will see two statues. One of these statues is of
Cayetano Arellano, the first Chief Justice, a man of absolute integrity,
and of the deepest legal wisdom. The other is of Chief Justice Jose Abad
Santos, who viewed his oath so sacred, and loved his country so deeply, he
preferred to die at the hands of the Japanese rather than betray his
country.
The Supreme Court itself, then, views the position of Chief Justice as
beyond politics, beyond personal considerations, and always about putting
honor and justice ahead of every other consideration. *Pagkatao po ang
ating pinag-uusapan dito*. The Code of Judicial Conduct demands that a
judge must be like Caesar's wife – someone who must not only be pure but
must be beyond suspicion at all times. Therefore, a Justice must be judged
according to the highest standards. Against such standards, we then ask:
Who is Chief Justice Corona? What kind of a man is he? *Ano po ba ang
pagkatao ni Renato Corona?*
Chief Justice Renato Corona was a loyal servant to former President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo from the time she became Vice-President in 1998 until she
became President in 2001. Such loyalty had numerous rewards for the Chief
Justice. Imagine, GMA paid for his back surgery. His wife was given plum
positions in the John Hay Management Corporation. He was appointed
Associate Justice, and the best reward of all, against all odds, he took a
midnight oath as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Corona's appointment as Chief Justice also served an immoral purpose: that
of shielding GMA from prosecution for her misdeeds during her presidency.
The prosecution will show how Chief Justice Corona became the crowning
glory of the cast of accomplices of former President Arroyo, and how he
protected GMA's interest in exchange for his position of prestige and
power. This is at the heart of Article 1 of the Impeachment Complaint.
This unholy alliance between Chief Justice Corona and GMA, and Corona's
deep indebtedness to the former President culminated in the issuance of a
temporary restraining order (TRO) to enable GMA and her husband to leave
the country, and escape accountability. This is Article 7, Corona's biggest
favor yet to his benefactor. And in Article 4, we will show how the Chief
Justice intervened in the impeachment case against former Ombudsman
Merceditas Gutierrez also to protect GMA.
In Articles 3 and 5, we will show the lack of moral fitness of Chief
Justice Renato Corona when he committed acts of impropriety involving
parties with pending cases in the Supreme Court. His mockery of the
disciplinary institutions of the Supreme Court in the plagiarism charge
against a Supreme Court Associate Justice will be proven in Article 6. And
in Article 8, we will show how he failed to account for the Judiciary
Development Fund (JDF) and the Special Allowance for the Judiciary (SAJ),
funds which are managed by the Chief Justice. *Malinaw po: Kung gusto
natin ng hustisya, hindi na dapat ipagkatiwala kay Chief Justice Corona ang
pinakamataas na pwesto sa hudikatura.*
* *
And finally, we come to Article 2 where the prosecution will prove that
Chief Justice Renato Corona amassed ill-gotten wealth after he was
appointed to the Supreme Court in 2002. To give you an idea of this
article, let me present to you some of the prized pieces of the Corona
crown jewels:
Spanish Bay Tower, Bonifacio Ridge, acquired October 14, 2005, purchase
price Php9,159,940;
McKinley Hill, Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City, acquired October 21, 2008,
purchase price Php6,196,575;
Bellagio I Tower, Taguig, acquired December 2009, purchase price of
Php14,510,225;
The Columns, Ayala Avenue, Makati City, acquired in 2004;
One Burgundy Plaza – the building where Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo had a
penthouse unit while she was Vice-President - acquired in 2003, purchase
price Php2,758,000; and
Number 57 Maranao Street, La Vista, acquired in 2003, zonal valuation
Php20.4 million, sold to his daughter for Php18 million.
The governing principle of our laws is clear: unexplained discrepancy
between an official's income and his assets, declared or undeclared, is *prima
facie *evidence of ill-gotten wealth, and therefore, is an impeachable
crime of graft and corruption.
The process of accountability is always a painful one. But the legislature
is tasked by no less than the Constitution, the very expression of the
people's will, to undertake this sacred duty. And if at this instance,
this is how we are called upon to be of service to our country, impeach we
must. Mr. Senate President, your honors, we submit that Renato Corona, by
his misdeeds, is unfit to remain Chief Justice.
In closing, the message of the House, as the representatives of the people,
is the same as that given by Oliver Cromwell when he dismissed England's
Long Parliament on April 20 of 1653. Before God and country, we say: "It is
high time for us to put an end to your sitting in that place, which you
have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your
practice of every vice, you are an enemy to good government, as you have
sold your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas Escariot betrayed
your God for a few pieces of gold. Depart I say, and let us have done with
you. In the name of God, go!"
Thank you and good afternoon.
